Great book, but...

You had one job.

There are many people who can’t pronounce the word nuclear, and instead say something that sounds a bit like newkiller.

No big deal in day to day life, but maybe when you choose someone to read a book about a nuclear energy disaster, and have to hear it MISPRONOUNCED EVERY THIRTY SECONDS...

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

16 people found this helpful

Amazing, highly detailed and in depth.

I really got this because I enjoyed the mini series. It was fascinating to see how events really played out without have to translate the facts into a TV drama. It's quite a bit different from Chenobyl the 6 part TV series. Well worth a listen if such things grip you.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

A must have in library

If your interested in Chernobyl at all this is a must very deep and good look at what happened

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Exciting, thoughtful and worrying

The story of Chernobyl is very well told and presented. Although there is minor focus on the event itself, there is an thorough in-depth description of the political and government system behind the accident between Urksine and Russia, and a more worrying side view of the future to come.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Compelling Study of a 1980s Icon

Loved every minute of this. it's a lesson on chaos, mismanagement, politics and human nature. Could be read alongside any book about the Challenger disaster which happened a few weeks earlier. The West is not perfect either.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

The narrator can't pronounce "nuclear"

First of all, this is a stunning piece of work. The level or research, detail and clarity in the storytelling is incredible. To be able to cover the context, the technicalities, the human stories and the geopolitical and historical implications of the Chernobyl disaster in one, gripping text is an admirable achievement and I would recommend this book to anyone.

There is a "but" though, and this might seem like a very pedantic thing to say; but how could they have picked someone to narrate this book, who cannot pronounce the word "Nuclear"? The word is in every other paragraph!

Surely at some point in the process (if not in an audition but at least in the first recording session), once you've heard "Nucular", "Nuculalalar", "Nuclurar" and "Nuclear" used interchangeably, you'll call "pause" and ask the guy to go and practice a bit more? It's indescribably annoying and almost ruined the book for me. As it was, every time the narrator mangled the word (which he does 50-60% of the time), a voice in my head silently screamed "NUCLEAR" in protest. It's like listening to a piece of music being played by an orchestra with one particularly loud instrument out of tune. Every time you hear the bum note you wince.

I'd recommend this for the subject matter, the quality of the material and the skill with which the story has been written. Just be prepared for the possibility that you'll spend the many hours you'll spend listening to this book intensely annoyed with the narrator (who is otherwise excellent).

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

17 people found this helpful

Fantastic but Conflicting information: update required

After watching the brilliant TV serialisation of the disaster on Sky. I wanted to know in more detail what occurred both politically and on a humanitarian level. This book does a fine job of informing the reader. Unfortunately there is a conflict of information in Chapter 13 (p207 kindle book) regarding a team of divers tasked with shutting off a group of valves below the reactor. The written version and the TV series tells us the team of divers miraculously survived the successful mission but the audio narration tells us they all died of radiation exposure weeks after completing the task. In a modern world dominated by the use of the word fake news, would it be too much to ask that the editors check the cohesion of both written and audio versions in respect for the men and families involved in a task that most definitely saved the lives of all future generations living in the region outside the 30km exclusion zone. Thank you....

I urge anyone believing that nuclear power is the answer to humanities energy requirements please read this book.

All biological life could be wiped out with a nuclear disaster even marginally larger than that at Chernobyl. A mere 5% of the 250 pound uranium was released into the air. The remaining unstable fuel that has a deadly half-life is 24000 years sits in a newly completed sarcophagus with a design life of 100 years......

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Good book, mixed narration

Well written, but it seems strange to choose a narrator that cannot pronounce “nuclear” for a book on Chernobyl, and that mispronunciation becomes distracting.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

So In Depth

Perfect , I'm So Eager To Go And Explore Myself , This Book Made Me Feel Like I Was There

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!

Narrator says ‘nuclear’ wrong

I don’t know how Leighton Pugh’s boss/editor let slide that Leighton, his narrator, was incorrectly saying “nuclear” as “nucular”. In an audiobook about nuclear power, nuclear physics, a nuclear accident and nuclear fallout, it is almost inexcusable and certainly unbearable that the man says “nucular” as though he were a five year old American child. Awful performance. Somebody give him some dictation lessons.

You voted on this review!

You reported this review!